- Home
- Resources
- Knowledge & Learning
- Why is MXene Better Than Graphene? A Comparative Perspective for Researchers
Graphene has been an attractive two-dimensional (2D) material that researchers and industries are taking an interest in for a long time because of its superior electrical and mechanical properties. However, in recent years, a newly developed 2D material—MXene—has attracted extensive attention from both academia and industry and has rapidly become the "next generation" material that outperforms graphene in a wide range of research and applications in terms of energy storage, EMI shielding, solution processability, etc.
Click to view the various types of MXene materials we provide for different applications in our MXene product catalog here.
In this article, we will take a close look at MXene and graphene and provide you with a detailed comparison and analysis from the structure, electrical conductivity, surface chemistry, and electrochemical performance, etc., dimensions to help you understand why MXene has a stronger application advantage than graphene in some specific aspects and fields.
MXene, as a new family of 2D materials, is composed of transition metal carbides, nitrides, or carbonitrides. In MXene, its chemical formula is generally expressed as Mn+1XnTx, where M is a transition metal, usually Ti, Sc, Zr, Nb, V, Mo, Cr, etc.; X is carbon (C), nitrogen (N), or carbon-nitrogen (C-N); n is the number of layers and is usually 1, 2, or 3; Tx represents the surface functional group such as -F, -OH, -O, -Cl, etc.
The most typical structural characteristics of MXene are its 2D layered structure (sheet-like), and in this layered structure, the layers are interleaved by metal layers and carbon (or nitrogen) atoms filled in octahedral positions, forming an accordion-like structure. This structural feature gives MXene a high specific surface area, excellent electrical conductivity, and tunable surface chemistry. According to the differences in structural types, MXenes are divided into ordinary MXenes (o-MXenes) and in-situ MXenes (i-MXenes), single-transition-metal, multi-transition-metal, and ordered/disordered structures, etc.
MXenes include a variety of types of materials, and the most commonly used and studied one is Ti3C2Tx (MXene of titanium carbide). In its chemical formula, Ti represents titanium, C is carbon, and Tx represents the surface functional groups containing -F, -OH, -O, etc. Other common MXenes include Mo2TiC2Tx, Nb2CTx, Ti2CTx, Ti4N3Tx, etc.
The preparation of MXenes mainly starts from selective etching of the A layer in the MAX phase (Mn+1AXn) to obtain MXene. The MAX phase is a ternary layered compound composed of a transition metal (M), a main group element (A), and carbon or nitrogen (X), as shown below.
a. Chemical Etching (HF Etching)
The most widely used method is to use chemical etching in HF/HCl solution or other chemical reagents to etch out the Al layer in Ti3AlC2 (MAX phase). This produces multilayer MXene (ML-MXene) Ti3C2Tₓ. This method has the advantages of simple operation and low cost, but the etching process uses toxic HF solution and also requires subsequent treatment of HF.
b. Alternative Green Etching Methods
To avoid secondary pollution to the environment and humans by HF, a series of alternative green etching methods have been proposed in recent years, including mild etching agents NH4F/H2O2 and so on. In these methods, HF is no longer used in the process of etching, but the method can still remove the A layer and obtain MXene.
c. Mechanical Exfoliation
The multilayer MXenes can also be exfoliated into monolayer MXene by ultrasonic dispersion or mechanical exfoliation. For example, the multilayer MXene Ti3C2Tx (prepared by HF etching of Ti3AlC2) is further dispersed or ground by sonication to obtain monolayer MXene.
d. Bottom-Up Synthesis
In addition to the "top-down" MXenes synthesized by etching MAX phases, there are also "bottom-up" synthesis methods, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and atomic layer deposition (ALD). The former has the advantage of "atom layer" or "molecule layer" controlled growth of MXene and atomic or molecular scale synthesis, while the latter is mainly in the experimental research stage and is not yet used in large-scale production.
From the material's structure, electrical conductivity, surface chemistry and functionalization ability, processability and dispersibility, and electrochemical performance and electromagnetic shielding and microwave absorption, etc., different aspects, a comparison between MXene and graphene is made in the following figure and table. In summary, in the five aspects of electrical conductivity, surface functionalization, dispersibility, electrochemical properties, and EMI shielding, MXene outperforms graphene.
MXene shows a metallic-like conductivity that is generally higher than that of graphene. For example, the electrical conductivity of Ti3C2Tₓ MXene can reach up to 8,500 S/cm or even higher values. Graphene's conductivity is typically 6,000 S/cm, and its maximum conductivity theoretically can reach 108 S/m. However, while MXene's conductivity is high, it is still generally considered inferior to graphene. For example, MXene's conductivity can be as high as 104 S/cm, and some articles report conductivity as high as 15,100 S/cm, which is higher than that of graphite (106 S/m). Nevertheless, this still falls short of graphene's theoretical conductivity of 108 S/m. In terms of electrical conductivity, MXene has an advantage in application scenarios that require high electrical conductivity, such as electromagnetic shielding and supercapacitors.
Figure 1. Comprehensive comparative analysis of key material properties between MXene and graphene
MXene contains abundant tunable surface functional groups such as -OH, -F, -O, and its surface can be chemically modified and easily combined with other molecules, which can be used to regulate the electrochemical performance, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility of MXene. On the contrary, graphene has a relatively inert surface, and it is generally necessary to undergo chemical modifications to functionalize graphene to make it active. The existence of surface functional groups of MXene also endows it with better dispersibility in water, so MXene is more suitable for spray preparation, printed electronics, and membrane materials, etc.
MXene has excellent hydrophilicity and can be well dispersed in aqueous solution. On the contrary, graphene is insoluble in water or most solvents, and its dispersions tend to agglomerate, with poor dispersibility. Therefore, MXene has an advantage in application scenarios such as flexible electronic devices and electromagnetic shielding materials that require good processability and sprayability. Moreover, MXene's processability is more straightforward than that of graphene and does not require complex chemical and thermal treatments for surface functionalization.
MXene's excellent electrochemical performance is another reason for its application prospects. For example, MXene has superior electrochemical performance in the field of supercapacitors, with a higher specific capacitance than graphene, which can be attributed to its pseudocapacitive behavior and fast ion transport channels. Experimental studies have shown that MXene supercapacitors have a specific capacitance of several hundred F/cm³, much higher than traditional carbon-based materials. In addition, due to its high conductivity and specific surface area, MXene also shows great potential in energy storage and conversion.
MXene also has excellent electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding and microwave absorption performance. Due to its high conductivity and layered structure, MXene can achieve good electromagnetic wave shielding through multiple reflection and interfacial charge transfer processes. For example, it was reported that a Ti3C2Tₓ MXene film with a thickness of 6 µm can reach EMI shielding effectiveness (SE) >50 dB, and graphene materials generally have a lower SE value. In addition, it was also found that MXene foam structure could achieve EMI SE values as high as 70 dB, while graphene foams usually have a much lower value of ~25.2 dB. Due to the combination of high conductivity and lightweight, MXene has strong application potential in 5G and other microwave absorption and electromagnetic shielding materials.
Table 1 summarizes the key performance comparisons discussed above, illustrating MXene's advantages over graphene in five dimensions: electrical conductivity, surface functionalization, dispersibility, electrochemical behavior, and electromagnetic shielding.
Table 1. MXene vs Graphene Performance Comparison Table
Performance Dimension | MXene | Graphene | Comparison Summary |
Electrical Conductivity | Ti3C2Tₓ MXene: 8,500–15,100 S/cm; theoretically ~104 S/cm | ~6,000 S/cm; theoretical limit ~108 S/m | Although graphene has a higher theoretical conductivity, MXene performs better and more consistently in practical applications. |
Surface Chemistry & Functionalization | Rich in tunable -OH, -F, -O groups; easily functionalized | Relatively inert surface; requires chemical treatment | MXene is more surface-active, making it easier to prepare functional materials. |
Processability & Dispersibility | Excellent hydrophilicity; disperses well in water; suitable for spraying and printed electronics | Tends to agglomerate; poor dispersibility; harder to process | MXene offers better processability and solution-based handling. |
Electrochemical Performance | High specific capacitance (hundreds of F/cm³); pseudocapacitive and fast ion transport | Limited by surface defects and active sites | MXene outperforms in supercapacitors and energy storage fields. |
Shielding & Microwave Absorption | >50 dB EMI SE at 6 µm thickness; up to 70 dB in foam structure | Typically lower SE; graphene foam ~25.2 dB | MXene has stronger potential in 5G, electromagnetic protection, and related areas. |
MXene's application in the field of energy storage mainly lies in its outstanding performance as an anode material for lithium/sodium-ion batteries and as an electrode material for supercapacitors. With its high specific surface area, abundant surface functional groups, and excellent electrical conductivity, MXene enables efficient ion storage and transport, thereby enhancing the performance of batteries and supercapacitors.
Figure 2. Application-specific MXene properties for supercapacitors
MXene's application in sensors and biomedicine is mainly attributed to its good conductivity, biocompatibility, and highly active surface chemistry. MXene can be used for the preparation of flexible sensors, biosensors, and gas sensors, etc., which provide high sensitivity, wide linear range, and wearability.
MXene is also suitable for electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials due to its excellent electrical conductivity and EMI shielding performance. With high conductivity and tunable interlayer spacing, MXene can effectively absorb and reflect electromagnetic waves and provide EMI shielding.
Figure 3. Ultrathin, flexible and oxidation-resistant MXene/graphene porous films for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding
MXene's application in flexible and wearable electronics is due to its excellent mechanical properties and electrical conductivity. MXene can be used to prepare flexible electrodes, sensors, and batteries and is a suitable material for wearable electronic devices and smart health monitoring systems.
MXene, as a new type of two-dimensional material, has shown broad application potential in energy storage, catalysis, and sensing, etc. In these fields, MXene exhibits excellent electrochemical performance, good thermal stability, and mechanical strength. However, in practical applications, there are also some issues that need to be considered before it can be used. The primary issues are related to its oxidation stability and difficulty in mass production.
Compared with MXene, graphene has made some breakthroughs in large-scale production. Although the cost of graphene production is still relatively high, some cheaper and efficient methods have been developed, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and liquid-phase exfoliation. These methods make it possible for the graphene material to be produced in certain scales. In addition, the methods for surface functionalization and structure tuning of graphene have also been relatively mature, making it possible to better control the properties of the graphene material and apply it to more fields.
However, compared with graphene, the large-scale production of MXene is still in the early stage. Although there are many synthesis routes for MXene, the cost of raw materials is still high, and the processes and equipment are still complex and expensive. In addition, due to the more complex surface chemistry of MXene, which is related to different functional groups such as -F, -OH, -O, etc., the surface modification and functionalization of MXene are more difficult. Thus, further breakthroughs are still needed in the synthesis process, cost control, and stability of material performance for the large-scale production of MXene.
MXenes still have a very promising future in some specific applications. On the one hand, due to its excellent performance, MXene can be widely used in energy storage, electrocatalysis, gas sensing, flexible electronics, etc. In particular, it has been found that MXene-based heterostructures have high sensitivity and fast response for gas sensing, which has very important application value in environmental monitoring and biomedical diagnosis. In the future, the research trend will mainly focus on the following aspects:
While graphene has been foundational in the early history of 2D materials, MXene has clearly outperformed and proved to be more practical than graphene in many applications of interest, ranging from energy storage to EMI shielding to flexible electronics.
As synthesis, stability, and functional structure design continue to be improved, MXene will slowly overtake graphene in both research and engineering, to become another cornerstone of 2D materials.
1. Is MXene more conductive than graphene?
Yes. While graphene has been hyped as a material with very high conductivity, the performance in practice often falls short. On the other hand, MXenes like Ti3C2Tx has been experimentally measured to have a conductivity higher than 10,000 S/cm, which is much more than enough for most applications and much higher than can be realized with graphene.
2. Why is MXene a better material for energy storage?
The pseudocapacitive mechanism of MXenes, together with their fast ion diffusion pathways and tunable interlayer spacing, leads to very much improved capacitance and charge/discharge rate, compared to graphene.
3. Is MXene better than graphene for all purposes?
Not necessarily. Graphene is still superior in some very specific applications like optical transparency and ultra-high-speed electron transport. However, MXene is better for most if not all other applications, including electrochemistry, flexible electronics, electromagnetic shielding, and much more.
Alfa Chemistry provides cost effective, high quality and hassle free services to our clients worldwide. We guarantee on-time delivery of our results.
If you have any questions at any time during this process, please contact us. We will do our best to meet your needs.
Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Copyright © 2025 Alfa Chemistry. All rights reserved.